Search This Blog

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Privacy is dead in the US: US Court gives government the go-ahead for warrantless wiretaps

Court gives government the go-ahead for warrantless wiretaps — RT

A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that the government is immune to wireless wiretapping lawsuits in a decision that the plaintiff’s attorney says releases Washington and the White House from ever being held accountable for spying on citizens.

A three-judge panel serving the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in California canceled an attempt from the attorney representing the now-defunct al-Haramain Islamic Foundation to hold the federal government accountable for wiretapping his clients without a warrant, despite previously winning a federal case on the argument that the interception of phone records occurred illegally.
A San Francisco federal judge ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in 2010 after attorney’s for the Islamic Foundation successfully took on the government for spying on his client under the Bush administration’s so-called Terrorist Surveillance Program. At the time the judge ruled that the government owed the plaintiffs $40,800 in damages and attorneys $2.5 million in legal fees but attempts to collect those funds have been unsuccessful ever since. On Tuesday, the appeals court said the government has legal immunity from the lawsuit and determined that the previous decisions should be overruled.
“This case effectively brings to an end the plaintiffs’ ongoing attempts to hold the executive branch responsible for intercepting telephone conversations without judicial authorization,” the appeals court writes.
“Under this scheme, Al-Haramain can bring a suit for damages against the United States for use of the collected information, but cannot bring suit against the government for collection of the information itself,” Judge M. Margaret McKeown writes for the unanimous majority. “Although such a structure may seem anomalous and even unfair, the policy judgment is one for Congress, not the courts.”
Although the panel appeared to agree with the plaintiffs, even writing that the latest update “does not in any way call into question the integrity with which they pursued” their lawsuit, they nonetheless reversed a decision that al-Haramain’s lawyer says sets a dangerous precedent for everyone else in America.
“If this is the last word on warrantless wiretapping then it means that there will have been no accountability for it,” the lawyer responds, according to the Associated Press.
“There is no accountability,” attorney Jon Eisenberg tells the Los Angeles Times. “That is what is so distressful about this decision. It means that President Bush got away with it, and it means that President Obama will be able to get away with it and every president after him.”
The extent of government wiretapping “is a government secret, and the courts aren’t going to have anything to do with revealing those secrets,” Eisenberg adds.
AFP Photo / Paul J. Richards22.05, 01:128 comments

NSA under fire: Supreme Court to review legality of warrantless wiretapping of Americans

Phone calls to Prague? Emails to Ecuador? The United States government can currently sift through any international communication that crosses outside of American territory, but all that might soon change.
Overview of Camp Williams site before the construction works began. UDC will be located on the west side of the highway, on what was previously an airfield (Image from, 05:0954 comments

NSA Utah ‘Data Center’: Biggest-ever domestic spying lab?

The biggest-ever data complex, to be completed in Utah in 2013, may take American citizens into a completely new reality where their emails, phone calls, online shopping lists and virtually entire lives will be stored and reviewed.
The government can take data from your phones to see where you are.27.07.2011, 20:451 comment

Government admits to spying through your cell phone

The US government is in a relationship with your cell phone provider, but “it’s complicated.”
Screenshot from YouTube channel TheCopBlockToday: 00:146 comments

Journalist faces 21 years in jail for recording police

The journalist behind a popular activism site is facing 21 years in prison for publishing conversations with law enforcement officials that he says were on-the-record while investigating a police brutality case in the state of New Hampshire.
Photo from news.21.by25.05, 22:4151 comments

FBI secretly creates Internet police

The FBI was rather public with its recent demands for backdoor access to websites and Internet services across the board, but as the agency awaits those secret surveillance powers, they're working on their own end to have those e-spy capabilities.
NJ finds NYPD Muslim surveillance is legal25.05, 01:2317 comments

Spying and profiling Muslims in New Jersey is apparently fine

The New Jersey State attorney general concluded a three month investigation on Thursday, ruling that law enforcement officers with the New York Police Department were not at fault by profiling and spying on Muslims outside of their jurisdiction.

No comments:

Post a Comment